[SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.10 Kernel

- - ALL UNSTABLE / TESTING THREADS SHOULD BE POSTED HERE - -
This sub-forum is the dedicated area for the ongoing Unstable/Testing releases of Debian. Advanced, or Experienced User support only. Use the software, give, and take advice with caution.
Post Reply
Message
Author
pwzhangzz
Posts: 510
Joined: 2020-11-11 17:42
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 37 times

[SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.10 Kernel

#1 Post by pwzhangzz »

Linux kernel 6.9 has been EOL'd; accordingly Sid is now moved to the 6.10 kernel. However, some components of GNOME are being withheld from upgrade at the present time: (problem solved)
Screenshot from 2024-08-09 23-15-47.png
Last edited by pwzhangzz on 2024-09-17 16:33, edited 7 times in total.

Aki
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 3698
Joined: 2014-07-20 18:12
Location: Europe
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 486 times

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.x Kernal

#2 Post by Aki »

Perhaps you meant the subject to be "[SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.6.x Kernal" instead of "[SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.x Kernal"
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org
⠈⠳⣄⠀

pwzhangzz
Posts: 510
Joined: 2020-11-11 17:42
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.6 Kernal

#3 Post by pwzhangzz »

Yesterday (or the day bf?) the Linux kernel in Sid moved to version 6.6.13. To me at the least, the dizzying version number changes actually indicate the incredible amounts of efforts that our hardworking Debian developers have been trying to so aggressively keep Sid a leading (but definitely not bleeding!) edge OS. Probably as a result thereof, the stable version of Debian, currently bkworm, can actually keep up very well with very recent hardware advancements.

Recently we bought a Ryzen 7 5700U (with Radeon Vega 8 GPU) mini-PC, as shown in the attached screenshot:

ryzen7.mini-pc.jpeg

we are so amazed with the performance of bkworm on this machine! (Sid also works great) Measuring 12.5 x 11 x 4 (cm), it is more powerful than my current bulky desktop machine that we purchased only less than 3 years ago. And costs only a fraction of it ($280 vs over $1K).

Our office is budgeted to upgrade two pcs this year. If this mini-pc continues to run well, with the money saved, I may be able to convince my boss to purchase a couple of extras and donate them to some of our forum elders to help bkworm/sid developments. In the past, the shipping cost is prohibitive for any hardware donation (especially for international shipping).

User avatar
None1975
df -h | participant
df -h | participant
Posts: 1491
Joined: 2015-11-29 18:23
Location: Russia, Kaliningrad
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 80 times

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.6 Kernal

#4 Post by None1975 »

Sid has moved to the 6.6.8 kernal
By the way, this kernel series is longterm.....
OS: Debian 12.4 Bookworm / DE: XFCE
Debian Wiki | DontBreakDebian, My config files on github

pwzhangzz
Posts: 510
Joined: 2020-11-11 17:42
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Has now Moved to the 6.8 Kernel & GNOME to 46

#5 Post by pwzhangzz »

I noticed that the credentials related systemd services (???) are now mounted on tmpfs:
Attachments
Screenshot from 2024-05-18 11-11-59.png

oui
Posts: 126
Joined: 2008-01-29 20:51

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.8 Kernel & GNOME to 46

#6 Post by oui »

on my actual installation
sudo inxi -Cm
Memory:
System RAM: total: 8 GiB available: 3.12 GiB used: 1.19 GiB (38.3%)
igpu: 64.1 MiB
Array-1: capacity: 16 GiB slots: 2 modules: 2 EC: None
Device-1: ChannelA-DIMM0 type: DDR3 size: 4 GiB speed: 1333 MT/s
Device-2: ChannelB-DIMM0 type: DDR3 size: 4 GiB speed: 1333 MT/s
CPU:
Info: dual core model: Intel Core i7-2640M bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache:
L2: 512 KiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 1647 min/max: 800/3500 cores: 1: 1684 2: 1658 3: 1551
4: 1695
That new kernel from Debian continues to cause black screens (I must use the old kernel 6.1.0 !)

The kernel vmlinuz-6.8.0-31-generic does from Gentoo and all the kernel from Ubuntu Noble 2024.04 since middle of November 2023 not ;-) ! I think, Debian hat great problems...

I is now a unsecure (as you can't continue to work if that happens: installing through the only one installer known by Debian, the uggly old Debian installer, you can't decide at installations time which kernel you will get and after that, black screen and no way to continue to work. Thank you very much...

pwzhangzz
Posts: 510
Joined: 2020-11-11 17:42
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.10 Kernel

#7 Post by pwzhangzz »

pwzhangzz wrote: 2023-12-24 03:12 Linux kernel 6.9 has been EOL'd; accordingly Sid is now moved to the 6.10 kernel. However, some components of GNOME are being withheld from upgrade at the present time:
Screenshot from 2024-08-09 23-15-47.png
These GNOME components are now fully upgraded with the "apt full-upgrade" command. From our own experience, running apt full-upgrade can cause system to crash or mis-behave especially when running GNOME extensions. It is important to run this command on a test machine with full backup.

pwzhangzz
Posts: 510
Joined: 2020-11-11 17:42
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Moves into GNOME 47

#8 Post by pwzhangzz »

Sid is also moving into GNOME 47, on the same day the new version of GNOME was released. As of today, the GNOME components that are upgraded include:

Code: Select all

gnome-backgrounds/unstable 47.0-1 all [upgradable from: 47~beta-2]
gnome-bluetooth-3-common/unstable 47.0-2 all [upgradable from: 46.0-1]
gnome-bluetooth-sendto/unstable 47.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.0-1]
gnome-calculator/unstable 1:47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1:46.1-1]
gnome-calendar/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.1-1+b1]
gnome-characters/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~alpha-1]
gnome-connections/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~beta-1]
gnome-contacts/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.0-2]
gnome-core/unstable 1:47+1 amd64 [upgradable from: 1:47~beta+1]
gnome-font-viewer/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~alpha-1]
gnome-initial-setup/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~rc-1]
gnome-maps/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~beta-1]
gnome-music/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.1-1]
gnome-software-common/unstable 47.0-2 all [upgradable from: 46.4-1]
gnome-software-plugin-deb/unstable 47.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.4-1]
gnome-software-plugin-fwupd/unstable 47.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.4-1]
gnome-software/unstable 47.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.4-1]
gnome-system-monitor/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.0-1]
gnome-terminal/unstable 3.54.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 3.52.2-1]
gnome-text-editor/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.3-1]
gnome-user-docs/unstable 47.0-1 all [upgradable from: 47~beta-1]
gnome-user-share/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~alpha-1]
gnome-weather/unstable 47.0-1 all [upgradable from: 47~alpha-1]
nautilus/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.2-3]
orca/unstable 47.0-1 all [upgradable from: 46.2-1]
tecla/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~beta-1]
libgdm1/unstable 47.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.2-1]
gir1.2-nautilus-4.0/unstable 47.0-1 amd64
[upgradable from: 46.2-3]
gdm3/unstable 47.0-2 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.2-1]
eog/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 47~beta-1]
baobab/unstable 47.0-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 46.0-1]
adwaita-icon-theme/unstable 47.0-1 all [upgradable from: 47~beta-1]
Last edited by pwzhangzz on 2024-09-21 01:46, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sunrat
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 7165
Joined: 2006-08-29 09:12
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 616 times

Re: [SID - Unstable] Sid Moves to the 6.10 Kernel

#9 Post by sunrat »

@pwzhangzz you know it's preferred to use code tags for terminal text etc. And certainly not images. Please fix it.
“ computer users can be divided into 2 categories:
Those who have lost data
...and those who have not lost data YET ”
Remember to BACKUP!

Post Reply